Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Terence Atmane vs Martyn Pawelski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs Pawelski analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs Martyn Pawelski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Pawelski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 48.04% of points on their second serve, while Pawelski has won 47.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 46.6% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pawelski has won 50.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.63% and 28.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 64.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pawelski has saved 59.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 60.49% of matches played (W/L 49/ 32), with Pawelski winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Pawelski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 48/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14), where as Pawelski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62% of matches (W/L 31/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atmane winning 1 times and Pawelski being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Pawelski winning 1. The last match between Atmane and Pawelski was at the M15 Heraklion, 11-11-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atmane and Pawelski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Atmane winning 1 times and Pawelski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atmane winning 0, and Pawelski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.06 while Pawelski has played against players with an average rank of 176.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pawelski has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pawelski has converted 38.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
126
Rank
120
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
552
Rank
469
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
63% (183-109)
Career Total W/L
59% (72-51)
51% (18-17)
YTD W/L
63% (22-13)
$295,550
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Terence Atmane | Martyn Pawelski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (64/107) | 50% (35/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (42/64) | 74% (26/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (20/43) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (29/70) | 42% (45/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Martyn Pawelski
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Terence Atmane | Martyn Pawelski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (18/17) | 63% (22/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (45/43) | 60% (49/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (420/435) | 53% (417/373) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 64% (9/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.75 |
| Aces Total | 224 | 292 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 142 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:56 | 1:37:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 193.89 | 166.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1634/2756) | 62% (1463/2374) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1173/1634) | 76% (1119/1463) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (539/1122) | 47% (431/911) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (85/205) | 39% (85/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (907/2567) | 37% (893/2440) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (21/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (18/32) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (8/16) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 74% (19/14) | 83% (23/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 26% (19/5) | 17% (23/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 25% (12/3) |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
56 of
79)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Terence Atmane
68%
(
71 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Terence Atmane
56%
(
87 of
156)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
156)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
63 of
85)
51%
(
35 of
69)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
37%
(
58 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
64 of
156)
162
Total Points Won
150
|
3-6 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Terence Atmane
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Christopher Eubanks
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Martyn Pawelski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Martyn Pawelski
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Martyn Pawelski
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Peter Fajta
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
15
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Lukas Pokorny
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
16 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Martyn Pawelski
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Atmane Vs Pawelski Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Atmane are available here and Pawelski photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
